Sources: NFL players won’t be allowed to change their CBA votes despite many requesting to do so

The NFL player representatives on Monday voted down a resolution that would have allowed players who have already voted on the proposed CBA to change their votes, sources told ESPN.

Enough players had asked whether they could change their votes that the NFL player reps, in meetings taking place in Key Biscayne, Florida, decided to propose the resolution, but it did not succeed.

The union did vote to extend the voting window by 48 hours to allow more time for players to consider and vote on the proposal. The player representatives voted to extend the deadline to 11:59 p.m. ET Saturday.

The goal of the extension is to give players more time to digest the 456-page proposed CBA. With player representative meetings ongoing, the NFLPA and players want to tell their teammates of conversations held in the meeting rooms so that they can be better informed about the details of the potential deal.

The decision came Monday afternoon after what were described by one source as “lively” and intense discussions regarding the proposed CBA. All players were then sent an email detailing the vote extension. The previous deadline was 11:59 p.m. ET Thursday.

Currently, the NFL has a franchise tag and transition tag deadline of 4 p.m. ET Thursday. The league is deciding whether to extend that deadline to match the CBA vote, a source told ESPN. If there are no changes to that deadline, teams would be able to use both the franchise tag and the transition tag on players, but if the new CBA is passed, they would then have to rescind one of those tags if both are used.

The reaction to the proposed CBA has been polarizing. There has been strong dissent about the new CBA on social media from many NFL stars, including quarterbacks Russell Wilson and Aaron Rodgers, running backs Todd Gurley II and Kenyan Drake, cornerbacks Richard Sherman and Chris Harris Jr., defensive linemen Aaron Donald and Cameron Jordan, receivers Stefon Diggs, Tyler Lockett, Jarvis Landry and Kenny Stills, and offensive linemen Mike Pouncey and Maurkice Pouncey. Others, such as Miami Dolphins quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick, explained why they are voting yes.

Health and wellness, paired with the proposed 17-game schedule and a desire to get more benefits in negotiations, are among the reasons many players said they are voting “no.”

Increased minimum salaries, a marijuana drug policy change, increased roster spots, better work conditions and environment, better practice-squad pay, less hitting in training camp and increased benefits for current and former players are among the reasons some players said they are voting “yes.”

The NFLPA will elect a new president Tuesday.

NFL Free Agency 2020: Predicting Where the Top RBs Will Land

In recent years, NFL rushing offenses have changed. We’ve seen fewer bell-cow running backs and more committees featured. As a result, tailbacks may find it difficult to land lucrative deals on the free-agent market.

Furthermore, well-compensated running backs had underwhelming 2019 seasons. Sixteen ball-carriers eclipsed 1,000 yards. Only one of the top-five (annually) highest-paid backs, Ezekiel Elliott, belongs in that group. The other four, Todd Gurley II, Le’Veon Bell, David Johnson and Devonta Freeman, averaged fewer than 3.9 yards per carry.

If notable playmakers at the top of the wage market struggled to produce while averaging $8.25 million or more on their deals, teams may be hesitant to pay the next crop of free-agent tailbacks big money, especially with low-cost players clearing 1,000 rushing yards.

Nonetheless, free agency rewards production. Multiple players deserve pay raises, but we’re unlikely to see someone reset the market, topping Elliott’s six-year, $90 million contract. Still, veterans can make their cases to cash in.

Based on past production, let’s take a look at eight of the best impending free-agent running backs, unrestricted and restricted. We’ll match each player with a new team and provide a contract projection.

Barring an extension, Derrick Henry would go into free agency as the most coveted running back on the market when the new league year begins March 18. He earned the 2019 rushing title with 1,540 yards on 303 carries.

Quarterback Ryan Tannehill deserves credit for elevating the Tennessee Titans offense with his arm, but Henry averaged 149.1 yards per game between Week 10 and the AFC Championship Game.

As Henry saw an increase in rushing attempts through each of his four seasons, he upped his production. The Titans should feel comfortable handing the ball off to him 16-20 times per contest going forward.

Henry, arguably the best pure ball-carrier in the 2020 free-agent crop, comes up short in one aspect when compared to the top modern-day running backs. He doesn’t provide much in the passing game. The 26-year-old veteran had fewer than 19 catches in each of his campaigns.

The Titans can use Henry’s low reception numbers as a reason not to pay him $52-plus million like Elliott, Gurley and Bell, who all have multiple seasons with 50 or more receptions.

Because running back is one of the more replaceable positions, the Titans shouldn’t bend over backward to sign Henry. Nevertheless, he deserves a substantial raise.

Tennessee will pay Henry, but he won’t break the $50 million threshold in total contract value.

Prediction: Henry signs four-year, $48 million deal with the Titans.

Melvin Gordon III’s contract standoff with the Los Angeles Chargers started last offseason. He didn’t report to training camp and missed the first four weeks of the 2019 campaign. The organization won the financial tug-of-war, but the two-time Pro Bowler hopes to remain with the club, per Josh Alper of Pro Football Talk.

“Hopefully, I’m here,” Gordon said. “Hopefully, I don’t have to wait til [the new league year in] March to know where I’m gonna be playing.”

On the other hand, Gordon understands the Chargers’ plan may not involve him.

“When it comes to business, you have to take your emotions out of it,” he said. “It’s not about if you deserve to be here or not. I’ve talked to Tom [Telesco] plenty of times, he tells me ‘you deserve to get paid,’ but sometimes it just might not be the right situation.”

In Gordon’s absence, Austin Ekeler, who’s going to be a restricted free agent, flashed in the lead role. He’s every bit of a complete running back, logging 1,550 yards and 11 touchdowns from scrimmage during the 2019 campaign.

The Chargers are unlikely to keep both tailbacks on new deals. Don’t be surprised if they choose Ekeler, who’s two years younger and may be cheaper because of his restricted label.

Gordon’s demand for a new contract and his five-year history of taking on the featured position will probably lead him elsewhere. At 26 years old, he’s still in his prime and can produce with a high volume of touches.

The Miami Dolphins don’t have an established running back. None of their tailbacks has started more than eight games in a season. In 2019, Kalen Ballage led the team with 74 rushing attempts and recorded 135 yards and three touchdowns.

According to Spotrac, the Dolphins are projected to open the offseason with $93.7 million in cap space, the most in the NFL. Gordon’s contract wouldn’t put a huge dent in their financial resources, and the backfield would have a proven commodity to elevate the ground attack.

Prediction: Gordon signs four-year, $42 million deal with the Dolphins.

General manager Tom Telesco can allow Gordon to walk in free agency because of Ekeler’s breakout 2019 campaign. More importantly, Ekeler is more of a quick-twitch athlete. As NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah illustrated, the shifty running back can shake cornerbacks out of their cleats with crisp route running.

This past season, Ekeler finished 10th in receptions (92) and had an impressive 85.2 percent catch rate. He not only has one of the best sets of hands in the league, but he’s also a decent ball-carrier, averaging 4.8 yards per rushing attempt for his career.

If the Chargers let Gordon sign elsewhere, Ekeler would more than likely return for his fourth season in Los Angeles.

Keep in mind, Ekeler’s restricted free-agent tag allows the Chargers to match offers for him on the open market. L.A. could also sign him to an early extension, which would indicate the team is moving on from Gordon.

Spotrac estimates Ekeler would be worth $11.9 million on the open market compared to $11.7 million for Gordon.

While splitting hairs between two similar talents, the Chargers will choose to lock up Ekeler on a long-term deal and hope to see him build on his 2019 numbers in a full-time starting position.

ESPN predicts Rams will shop Todd Gurley this offseason

Todd Gurley’s knee was the most talked-about storyline last offseason as everyone wondered if he would be his normal self after taking a backseat in last year’s playoffs. The speculation and concerns turned out to be warranted as Gurley had his worst season since 2016.

He was also used less than he ever has been, getting a career-low 223 carries and only catching 31 passes in 15 games. Malcolm Brown was more involved in the offense, and Darrell Henderson got a small share of touches, too, which helped make up for Gurley’s reduced role.

All of this took place in a year when Gurley’s lucrative contract extension hadn’t even kicked in yet. That begins in 2020 and will run through 2023 at an average of $14.38 million per year.

Gurley clearly isn’t the running back he once was and the Rams are now in a predicament. Do they pay him more than $14 million per season to be an average back or do they trade him and try to offload his contract? ESPN’s Lindsey Thiry predicts the Rams will at least try to shop him, though finding a trade partner could be tough.

His cap hit in 2020 is $17.25 million, the highest of any running back in the NFL. It’ll be at least $12.4 million in each of the following three years, too, so it’s not as if he’ll get significantly cheaper any time soon.

Brown and Henderson are capable backs for the Rams and would be able to carry the load if Gurley is traded. They don’t possess the proven production that Gurley has, but Henderson showed how explosive he was last season and Brown has earned the trust of the coaching staff.

It’s going to be an interesting offseason in Los Angeles, given the team’s need for cap space and the difficulty of finding it with such a top-heavy roster.

Rams’ path to trading Todd Gurley is littered with hurdles

All the talk surrounding the Los Angeles Rams this week has centered around Todd Gurley and his future with the team. ESPN predicted that the Rams will shop Gurley this offseason, in an attempt to free up some cap space and offload his massive contract.

NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reported that the Rams will meet with Gurley to discuss how they’ll handle the situation, and “all options are on the table.” That includes keeping the two-time All-Pro, trading him and potentially cutting him – which isn’t a beneficial move because of the $25.65 million dead cap hit the Rams will incur by releasing him.

If the front office is set on parting ways with Gurley, trading him is really the only possible move. It’s easy to say they can just put him on the block and get back a Day 2 pick, but actually pulling that off is much more difficult.

There are hurdles on the path to trading Gurley, beginning with his contract. He has the largest cap hit of any running back in the NFL next season at $17.25 million. At a position that’s been devalued and with the top-paid running backs mostly failing to live up to their contracts, it’s hard to imagine a team trading for his current deal.

Take a look at this list of the 10 highest-paid running backs in the NFL and how they fared in 2019. It’s a cautionary tale for any team considering giving a running back top dollar.

Digging into Gurley’s deal further, he has a $7.55 million roster bonus due to him on the third day of the new league year (March 20), which the Rams will be on the hook for if he’s still on the team. Additionally, another $5 million roster bonus in 2021 becomes fully guaranteed on that day, according to Tom Pelissero of NFL Network. That’s part of the remaining $10.5 million in injury guarantees that become fully guaranteed on March 20.

If the Rams trade Gurley, they’ll take on $12.6 million in dead money in 2020, saving only $4.65 million in cap space. It’s not a significant amount, of course, and that dead cap charge will feel like a waste of money for a team with very little cap space as it is. That’s one of the primary hurdles when it comes to trading him.

Gurley’s cap hit in 2021 is more manageable at $13.2 million, but that’s still a hefty price tag for a (to-be) 27-year-old running back with injury concerns. And it’s not like the trading team would be able to get out of his contract without penalty in 2021, either. There’d be an $8.4 million dead cap charge if he’s cut, leaving a savings of just $4.8 million.

The combination of his contract and his injury history don’t necessarily make Gurley untradeable, but finding a partner to take on that deal at this point in his career is the biggest hurdle of all. Finding productive running backs in the middle rounds is very possible and it’s something teams have done a good job of in recent years. The added benefit of drafting a starting running back outside of the first round is how cheap their contracts are.

Nine of the top 10 rushers in the NFL last season were on rookie deals. The only one who wasn’t was Ezekiel Elliott, who finished second. In the top 20, Josh Jacobs, David Montgomery, Aaron Jones, Phillip Lindsay and Saquon Barkley are all also on affordable rookie contracts (with the exception of Barkley’s $7.8M salary).

Why would a team trade for a running back who will be 26 in August and pay him $14.4 million per year after seeing him struggle in 2019 and have his touches limited due to a knee injury? Why wouldn’t that same team just draft a running back with far less wear and tear in the second or third round, pay him about $2 million per year and save the cap space for a more important position?

That’s the issue the Rams will run into when attempting to trade Gurley. The market for running backs has washed up after seeing the deals for Gurley, Le’Veon Bell, David Johnson, Devonta Freeman and Jerick McKinnon all backfire in some way or another. Finding a trade partner and getting fair value for Gurley is doing to be a tall order if that’s the approach the Rams take.

Chiefs Mailbag: Trade For Todd Gurley? Kendall Fuller Or Bashaud Breeland? + Shaq Barrett Free Agency

Chiefs Rumors are flying around as NFL Free Agency kicks off in less than a month on March 18th. Chiefs Kingdom has lots of questions as the offseason is underway. Could the Chiefs trade for Todd Gurley? NFL trade rumors are circulating, but Gurley has a cap hit of over $17 million in 2020 which is more than the Chiefs total salary cap space of $13.7 million. Chiefs Report host Harrison Graham answers questions on today’s Chiefs Rumors Mailbag IN THE VIDEO ABOVE AND BELOW.

Love the Chiefs? If so, SUBSCRIBE to our BRAND NEW Chiefs-Only YouTube Channel for the latest Chiefs news, rumors & much more all year long! – Click the button below!

The Chiefs have several key free agents to make decisions on including Chris Jones, Bashaud Breeland and Kendall Fuller. With limited cap space, Kansas City may not be able to keep Fuller and Breeland. Which CB should the Chiefs prioritize? If Chris Jones gets too expensive, could the Chiefs opt to sign Shaq Barrett instead? Barrett had a breakout season with 19.5 sacks in 2019.

The Chiefs have five picks in the 2020 NFL Draft with one pick in each of the first 5 rounds. Kansas City’s biggest need is probably cornerback with the uncertainty of Breeland and Fuller moving forward. Could the Chiefs draft Virginia CB Bryce Hall? Hall was teammates with Juan Thornhill at Virginia and could fit in nicely in Steve Spagnuolo’s defense.

Today’s Chiefs Rumors & News Mailbag:
Free Agent LB Targets?
Draft Bryce Hall?
Bashaud Breeland or Kendall Fuller?
Todd Gurley trade?
Chiefs Free Agency Rumors
Chiefs Trade Rumors
Sign Shaq Barrett?
Draft an offensive lineman?

All our Chiefs shows can be watched on the Chat Sports Chiefs Facebook page.
Make sure to subscribe to Chat Sports on YouTube.
For news, stats and scores personalized to the teams you follow, download the Chat Sports app.

Rams, Bears, Jaguars and Other NFL Teams That Find Themselves in Salary-Cap Hell

Welcome to the Salary Cap Inferno, the bad place where teams are punished for their financial sins of the past.

NFL free agency is fast approaching, and while some teams are getting ready for a spending spree, others find themselves in financial H-E Double Hockey Sticks. Instead of bidding on big names and hoping to get better, they’ll be forced to let their own free agents go, release or restructure the contracts of some of their starters and hope the austerity program doesn’t make them significantly worse.

There’s more to the Cap Inferno than just being low on cap space. Teams that have lots of budding superstars under contract, are a heartbeat away from the Super Bowl or know they are preparing for a full-scale rebuild don’t qualify. The rings of the Cap Inferno are reserved for teams guilty of overspending, bad planning, wishful thinking or living the high life for too long, plus some minor venial sins like inking a few too many regrettable contracts.

So abandon all hope, ye who enter here: It’s time for a truly hellish journey through the realm of salary-cap nightmares.

If you remember reading (or skimming, or staying awake while the teacher explained) Dante’s Inferno, you know that the first ring wasn’t all that bad. It was like an extended-stay airport hotel for nice folks who didn’t follow Dante’s preferred religion, with no demons or pitchforks or such. Well, the first ring of the Cap Inferno isn’t so bad, either. The Patriots get to polish their Lombardi Trophies while pondering the consequences of trying to make their dynasty last forever.

A huge chunk of that $41.7 million in paper cap space—let’s estimate about $30 million—is probably earmarked for Tom Brady. The rest must be distributed among starters and contributors like safety Devin McCourty, guard Joe Thuney, defenders Jamie Collins and Kyle Van Noy and a host of others. The Patriots must also try to find a way to significantly upgrade their wide receiver and tight end corps, because Brady now needs a supporting cast to elevate his play instead of the other way around.

Of course, the Patriots could let Brady walk and start over, which would solve their cap problem by replacing it with several much larger problems.

The Patriots are sentenced to discover what every other team has gone through in the offseason for 20 years. They’ll have to draft for immediate needs instead of looking three years down the road. They may be forced to part with players they want to keep. They won’t be hailed as geniuses for signing 33-year-old slot receivers or defensive cast-offs.

Maybe they can figure it all out and remain in the playoff picture. But it’s been a long time since the Patriots have been forced to figure out ways to merely remain in the playoff picture.

NFL Free Agency 2020: Predicting Where the Top RBs Will Land

In recent years, NFL rushing offenses have changed. We’ve seen fewer bell-cow running backs and more committees featured. As a result, tailbacks may find it difficult to land lucrative deals on the free-agent market.

Furthermore, well-compensated running backs had underwhelming 2019 seasons. Sixteen ball-carriers eclipsed 1,000 yards. Only one of the top-five (annually) highest-paid backs, Ezekiel Elliott, belongs in that group. The other four, Todd Gurley II, Le’Veon Bell, David Johnson and Devonta Freeman, averaged fewer than 3.9 yards per carry.

If notable playmakers at the top of the wage market struggled to produce while averaging $8.25 million or more on their deals, teams may be hesitant to pay the next crop of free-agent tailbacks big money, especially with low-cost players clearing 1,000 rushing yards.

Nonetheless, free agency rewards production. Multiple players deserve pay raises, but we’re unlikely to see someone reset the market, topping Elliott’s six-year, $90 million contract. Still, veterans can make their cases to cash in.

Based on past production, let’s take a look at eight of the best impending free-agent running backs, unrestricted and restricted. We’ll match each player with a new team and provide a contract projection.

Barring an extension, Derrick Henry would go into free agency as the most coveted running back on the market when the new league year begins March 18. He earned the 2019 rushing title with 1,540 yards on 303 carries.

Quarterback Ryan Tannehill deserves credit for elevating the Tennessee Titans offense with his arm, but Henry averaged 149.1 yards per game between Week 10 and the AFC Championship Game.

As Henry saw an increase in rushing attempts through each of his four seasons, he upped his production. The Titans should feel comfortable handing the ball off to him 16-20 times per contest going forward.

Henry, arguably the best pure ball-carrier in the 2020 free-agent crop, comes up short in one aspect when compared to the top modern-day running backs. He doesn’t provide much in the passing game. The 26-year-old veteran had fewer than 19 catches in each of his campaigns.

The Titans can use Henry’s low reception numbers as a reason not to pay him $52-plus million like Elliott, Gurley and Bell, who all have multiple seasons with 50 or more receptions.

Because running back is one of the more replaceable positions, the Titans shouldn’t bend over backward to sign Henry. Nevertheless, he deserves a substantial raise.

Tennessee will pay Henry, but he won’t break the $50 million threshold in total contract value.

Melvin Gordon III’s contract standoff with the Los Angeles Chargers started last offseason. He didn’t report to training camp and missed the first four weeks of the 2019 campaign. The organization won the financial tug-of-war, but the two-time Pro Bowler hopes to remain with the club, per Josh Alper of Pro Football Talk.

“Hopefully, I’m here,” Gordon said. “Hopefully, I don’t have to wait til [the new league year in] March to know where I’m gonna be playing.”

On the other hand, Gordon understands the Chargers’ plan may not involve him.

“When it comes to business, you have to take your emotions out of it,” he said. “It’s not about if you deserve to be here or not. I’ve talked to Tom [Telesco] plenty of times, he tells me ‘you deserve to get paid,’ but sometimes it just might not be the right situation.”

In Gordon’s absence, Austin Ekeler, who’s going to be a restricted free agent, flashed in the lead role. He’s every bit of a complete running back, logging 1,550 yards and 11 touchdowns from scrimmage during the 2019 campaign.

The Chargers are unlikely to keep both tailbacks on new deals. Don’t be surprised if they choose Ekeler, who’s two years younger and may be cheaper because of his restricted label.

Gordon’s demand for a new contract and his five-year history of taking on the featured position will probably lead him elsewhere. At 26 years old, he’s still in his prime and can produce with a high volume of touches.

The Miami Dolphins don’t have an established running back. None of their tailbacks has started more than eight games in a season. In 2019, Kalen Ballage led the team with 74 rushing attempts and recorded 135 yards and three touchdowns.

According to Spotrac, the Dolphins are projected to open the offseason with $93.7 million in cap space, the most in the NFL. Gordon’s contract wouldn’t put a huge dent in their financial resources, and the backfield would have a proven commodity to elevate the ground attack.

General manager Tom Telesco can allow Gordon to walk in free agency because of Ekeler’s breakout 2019 campaign. More importantly, Ekeler is more of a quick-twitch athlete. As NFL Network’s Daniel Jeremiah illustrated, the shifty running back can shake cornerbacks out of their cleats with crisp route running.

This past season, Ekeler finished 10th in receptions (92) and had an impressive 85.2 percent catch rate. He not only has one of the best sets of hands in the league, but he’s also a decent ball-carrier, averaging 4.8 yards per rushing attempt for his career.

If the Chargers let Gordon sign elsewhere, Ekeler would more than likely return for his fourth season in Los Angeles.

Keep in mind, Ekeler’s restricted free-agent tag allows the Chargers to match offers for him on the open market. L.A. could also sign him to an early extension, which would indicate the team is moving on from Gordon.

Spotrac estimates Ekeler would be worth $11.9 million on the open market compared to $11.7 million for Gordon.

While splitting hairs between two similar talents, the Chargers will choose to lock up Ekeler on a long-term deal and hope to see him build on his 2019 numbers in a full-time starting position.

Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em Week 17: Final Fantasy Football Lineup Decisions to Consider

If you’re reading this, it’s too late. Your league has already mandated Week 17 as the final championship week and you can do nothing but embrace the chaos. You may not be able to play all of the guys who got you here—like the already-resting Lamar Jackson—but the waiver cavalry has brought reinforcements.

In last season’s Week 17, Josh Allen led the league in scoring with 40.46 fantasy points (in four-point-per-passing-touchdown leagues), C.J. Anderson dropped 21.4 and Blake Jarwin put up 29.9. Guys like Kenneth Dixon, Dwayne Washington, Alfred Morris and Doug Martin all rushed for 100-plus yards.

It is the week of the unsung hero so we are here to try to sing some praise. We list three starts and three sits at each position before analyzing one of each role’s unlikely players you should consider starting or sitting in the biggest, weirdest week of the football year.

A season-long underperformer in a must-win game against a juicy matchup. This is what Week 17 is all about. Carson Wentz has not topped 25 fantasy points since Week 1 and has scored under 20 fantasy points in seven of his last nine games.

But following an impressive outing against the Dallas Cowboys with playoff hopes on the line, Wentz is an elite option this week—possibly for the first time all year. Wentz has not thrown for under 250 yards in any of his last five games and has 10 touchdowns to just three interceptions during that span.

He has been fumbling the ball, with four lost in that stretch, but it’s hard to imagine him being that loose with the ball in a game against a weak defense, especially with his team’s postseason in question. The Giants are allowing just over 27 points per game over their last four, including 35 last week to Washington.

New York’s offense has shown flashes, but the defense can be exposed and Wentz will be a major factor in putting this game, and the Cowboys’ playoff hopes, out of reach.

For you to start Deshaun Watson, the Kansas City Chiefs must lose to the Los Angeles Chargers in their earlier game. With how unlikely that seems, you should be prepared to sit Watson in favor of someone who will play in a game with stakes.

If the Chiefs win, they clinch the third seed in the AFC. If they lose, the Texans can move up to third with a win over the Titans. Vegas has Kansas City as a nine-point favorite, per Caesars, and even that seems a little low. As Kansas City’s defense has improved recently, Denver’s has become shakier—something Andy Reid’s offense is likely to take advantage of.

If the Chiefs do somehow lose, then Watson becomes a decent start against a Tennessee team that has much more than one-spot seeding on the line. That matchup is not great and the odds are that Watson will end up resting following a Chiefs win anyway. Look elsewhere.

Those who rode the Gus Bus in 2018 know just how much horsepower his young wheels pack. On 249 career carries, he has averaged 5.2 yards per carry. He’s also busted off runs for 40-plus yards in each season, denoting the big-play ability that seems counterintuitive to his bruising style.

The reasons not to start Edwards in Week 17 are obvious: The Baltimore Ravens have clinched home-field advantage and are resting starters while the Pittsburgh Steelers are a stringent defense in a must-win situation.

Resting starters, including offensive lineman Marshal Yanda, is unideal for Edwards—as the absence of Lamar Jackson and other key players limits Baltimore’s offense. But Edwards has produced whenever he’s gotten opportunity, and Baltimore’s backup personnel should fit directly into the same scheme, with a mobile quarterback in Robert Griffin III, that has dominated teams all year.

John Harbaugh is a competitive guy, and the Ravens have never been the type to just take games off. The team’s ceiling may be limited, but Edwards is talented enough to be leaned upon against a defense that, while stout, lacks the offense to prevent volume and positive field position for the Gus Bus.

What They’re Saying: 49ers, Rams Preview Week 16 Matchup

The 11-3 San Francisco 49ers are set to play the Los Angeles Rams in the Levi’s® Stadium regular season finale on “Saturday Night Football.” Here’s what both locker rooms are saying ahead of the divisional matchup.

Niners Liners

Kyle Shanahan on what makes the Rams so difficult to face:

“They’re very talented. They’re very well-coached. I think over this last month they’ve been playing as good of football as anyone in the league. I think until the Sunday game got a little out of hand, they had a top-10 offense, a top-10 defense before that. They have a very good special teams. So, talent and coaching.”

QB Jimmy Garoppolo on what the Rams are doing differently compared to when they played in Week 6:

“Well, obviously, some different personnel. Dealing with trades, injuries, whatever it is. They’re playing fast right now, their defense is. They’ve got, obviously up front, (Los Angeles Rams defensive tackle) Aaron’s (Donald) unbelievable, but that whole D-line as a group is very talented. They make it difficult on you. We’ve got to play on time, get the ball out on time and things like that.”

Garoppolo on the challenges of playing against Jalen Ramsey:

“He’ll match receivers, he’ll stay on his side, so we kind of have to feel it out as the game gets started, but he’s a hell of a player. Jalen, he really is. He doesn’t make any throws easy for you, challenges everything, he’s long. He really does a good job.”

Cowboys confident Elliott deal done by opener

FRISCO, Texas — Dallas Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones is confident a deal with running back Ezekiel Elliott will get done before the team plays the New York Giants in the Sept. 8 regular-season opener.

“Things happen real quick,” Jones said on 105.3 The Fan in Dallas. “Sometimes within hours.”

As for a deal happening soon, Jones said, “I don’t think we’re close because there’s not a lot of activity.”

For nearly three weeks, the Cowboys have had an offer on the table that would make Elliott the second-highest-paid running back ahead of the $13.125 million average of Le’Veon Bell with the New York Jets and the $14.375 million average of Todd Gurley II with the Los Angeles Rams. The structure and guaranteed money in the Elliott offer is not known.

Earlier in training camp, Jones said the Cowboys would not be market setters for any of their contracts for Elliott, Dak Prescott and Amari Cooper, but he offered up a definition of what that term means to the organization.

“I think market-setting to me is when, it would be like a Thomas deal in New Orleans,” Jones said of the contract signed by Saints receiver Mike Thomas. “The highest-paid receiver is ($18 million) and all of a sudden it’s almost ($20 million). To me you’re changing the market when you do something like that. We just can’t go to a place like that.”

Elliott’s holdout is at 28 days and counting, and he is facing fines of $1.12 million and the possibility of having to repay $1.02 million of signing bonus money, although the penalties are at the team’s discretion.

Ever since it became apparent that he was dealing with an arthritic component in his knee, fantasy managers from all over have been wondering if Todd Gurley is still worth selecting within the first round of drafts this year.

Let’s give a quick background on Todd Gurley ’s rise to being a top back in the NFL. In 2015 the Rams selected Gurley as the tenth overall pick. Much hype was swirling around the first round back out of Georgia that offseason as the Rams were looking to reestablish their run-game identity.

During Gurley ’s rookie season, he rushed the ball 229 times for just over 1,100 yards (third-most) and 10 touchdowns with the Rams. Gurley averaged roughly about 14.5 fantasy points per game tying him with Adrian Peterson for the fourth-highest amount during 2015.

Then in 2016, Gurley had a down season rushing for 885 yards ranking him 17th among active running backs during that year. Gurley’s average fantasy points per game took a significant drop too as he plummeted from 14.5 in 2015 to just under 10 in 2016. His average points per game were 27th just behind the likes of guys like Jeremy Hill , Isaiah Crowell , and Ryan Mathews .

Many managers were very skeptical about selecting Gurley to be on their rosters heading into the 2017 regular season due to his uninspired performance from the season before.

As we all know, Gurley shocked the football world with an earth-shattering regular season in 2017 rushing for slightly over 1,300 yards (second-most), 13 touchdowns and averaged a little over 12 yards per catch in the air. Sean McVay’s new system revitalized all demoralized Todd Gurley fans, and the hype was back again.

He followed up a fantastic 2017 campaign with an even better 2018 season rushing for over 1,200 yards and scoring 20 total touchdowns giving him a league-leading 22.4 fantasy points per game. However, this is when things started to go wrong.